-
The Case for Abolishing the Primary System and Restoring Open Elections
Every two years, millions of Americans go to the polls on Election Day believing they are exercising the full weight of their democratic franchise. What they don’t always realize is that the most consequential decisions — who will actually appear on that ballot — were made months earlier in a process funded by their tax dollars but designed to serve the interests of two private political organizations. The American primary system, as currently constructed, is not democracy. It is democracy wearing democracy’s clothes.
It is time to end it.
(more…) -
A Face on a Wall: How Is This Mural Divisive?
In Providence, Rhode Island, a mural of a 23-year-old woman’s face went up on the side of a building. It was unfinished. It hurt no one. It blocked no road, disturbed no peace, and broke no law. And yet the mayor of the city called for its removal, the surrounding community erupted in outrage, and the building’s owners ultimately surrendered to the pressure and agreed to paint over it. The woman’s name was Iryna Zarutska. She was a Ukrainian refugee who survived a war, crossed an ocean, and was then stabbed to death on a commuter train in Charlotte, North Carolina by a career criminal with over a dozen prior arrests. She deserved better than what happened to her in Charlotte. She also deserved better than what happened to her in Providence.
(more…) -
Improving Ballot Access for Independent Candidates in Georgia
In a state as large and diverse as Georgia, voters should have meaningful choices when they go to the ballot box. But for independent and minor-party candidates, getting on that ballot is far more difficult than most people realize.
(more…)
Under current law, candidates who are not affiliated with major political parties must gather thousands—and in some cases tens of thousands—of petition signatures just to qualify. These signatures must come from registered voters and are subject to strict verification requirements. In practice, that means campaigns often need to collect far more than the minimum just to survive the review process.
For local races, this is challenging but sometimes achievable. For higher offices, such as Congress, it becomes a massive logistical and financial hurdle. The result is predictable: very few independent candidates ever make it onto the ballot.
This isn’t about removing standards or inviting chaos into our elections. Reasonable requirements are necessary to ensure that candidates demonstrate a basic level of public support. But Georgia’s system goes far beyond that. Compared to many other states, the barriers are simply too high and offer no practical alternatives.
There is a straightforward solution that would preserve election integrity while expanding voter choice: allow candidates to qualify either by collecting signatures or by paying a filing fee.
This approach is already used in other states. It ensures that candidates are serious while removing the need for costly and time-consuming petition drives that often discourage participation altogether.
Importantly, this is not a partisan issue. Whether a voter leans conservative, liberal, or somewhere in between, everyone benefits from a system that allows more voices to be heard and more choices to be considered.
Georgia has made progress in many areas over the years. Ballot access reform is a reasonable next step—one that would strengthen, not weaken, our democratic process.
Voters deserve options. It’s time our system reflected that.
Things I think about things I see
[
[
[
]
]
]
The musings of Larry D Burton 